|
|
Post by TheNewMads on Sept 27, 2011 9:24:38 GMT -5
Don't make me change your avatar to a roach motel. don't like to talk about nietzsche? no? that's a chip up the nose, i'm afraid. |
|
|
|
Post by Mitchell on Sept 27, 2011 10:10:26 GMT -5
Don't make me change your avatar to a roach motel. don't like to talk about nietzsche? no? that's a chip up the nose, i'm afraid. Nietzsche is fine. Mumms splitting marginal, and probably useless, philosophical hairs like some 19-year-old--who just toked off of his first skull bong--arguing over the liner notes of a Pink Floyd album is not. Hence my thought that he's freebasing bug bait. |
|
|
|
Post by TheNewMads on Sept 27, 2011 10:38:21 GMT -5
don't like to talk about nietzsche? no? that's a chip up the nose, i'm afraid. Nietzsche is fine. Mumms splitting marginal, and probably useless, philosophical hairs like some 19-year-old--who just toked off of his first skull bong--arguing over the liner notes of a Pink Floyd album is not. Hence my thought that he's freebasing bug bait. kierkegaard was also alleged to be a fairly jocular existentialist, as far as they go, i think. sartre, not so much. that dude was a doosh. camus, we'll prorate, i think it depended what mood you caught him. actually, the conversation of what philosophers you'd like to have a beer with, vs. which philosophers you'd like to pants and stuff face first into a trash can, would be a fun separate thread for when i spark my next Doberman and listen to The Moody Blues. hume? a barrel of monkeys. kant? unbearable. someone needed to do unto that dork as he wouldn't do unto others, big time. |
|
|
|
Post by mummifiedstalin on Sept 27, 2011 12:40:39 GMT -5
Nietzsche is fine. Mumms splitting marginal, and probably useless, philosophical hairs like some 19-year-old--who just toked off of his first skull bong--arguing over the liner notes of a Pink Floyd album is not. Hence my thought that he's freebasing bug bait. kierkegaard was also alleged to be a fairly jocular existentialist, as far as they go, i think. Go reread The Sickness Unto DeathHis fiction's depressing. His philosophy's actually pretty upbeat, especially the later social stuff. Happy person, actually. Just kinda subsumed his angst into the writings. This pretty much sums up William James' approach. Any other philosopher you'd like to hear me pass judgment on in one sentence or less? |
|
|
|
Post by mummifiedstalin on Sept 27, 2011 12:42:09 GMT -5
don't like to talk about nietzsche? no? that's a chip up the nose, i'm afraid. Nietzsche is fine. Mumms splitting marginal, and probably useless, philosophical hairs like some 19-year-old--who just toked off of his first skull bong--arguing over the liner notes of a Pink Floyd album is not. Hence my thought that he's freebasing bug bait. Oh, I can split hairs if you want me to. Don't tempt me! I'll go dig up some of my college philosophy essays and post that drivel on here. You only *think* you've heard me try to sound smart and pretentious... |
|
|
|
Post by Mitchell on Sept 27, 2011 12:51:13 GMT -5
You both are on glue.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheNewMads on Sept 27, 2011 12:55:28 GMT -5
Go reread The Sickness Unto DeathHis fiction's depressing. His philosophy's actually pretty upbeat, especially the later social stuff. Happy person, actually. Just kinda subsumed his angst into the writings. This pretty much sums up William James' approach. oh, yeah, i didn't mean to mislead you that i actually knew anything about any of these people. i was just judging them exclusively on their looks. to wit:  total partier!  totally grody wormface! |
|
|
|
Post by TheNewMads on Sept 27, 2011 12:57:01 GMT -5
also, i bet kant was a pantaloon sniffer. you can totally see it in his face.
|
|
|
|
Post by mummifiedstalin on Sept 27, 2011 13:19:46 GMT -5
Maybe, actually. I've just been using super glue and spray paint for some cub scout flag pole stands. There are countless inappropriate jokes in there. Have fun! |
|
|
|
Post by TheNewMads on Sept 27, 2011 13:24:19 GMT -5
well, what am i supposed to do? i ran out of roach fogger. |
|
|
|
Post by TheNewMads on Sept 27, 2011 13:31:14 GMT -5
incidentally, in case you wanted something that was actually somewhat tangentially related to the thread OP... whywomenhatemen.blogspot.com/a (somewhat work-questionable...) blog about men and why they're a big, big problem. it's pretty old but i got quite a kick out of it back in the day. it includes such insights as... |
|
|
|
Post by mummifiedstalin on Sept 27, 2011 13:43:24 GMT -5
Seal hunters poke baby seals somewhat roughly with the end of their poles when they get a little too excited? This woman needs to get a grip (!) on her metaphors...a little closer to the tip, I'd say.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheNewMads on Sept 27, 2011 13:53:57 GMT -5
Seal hunters poke baby seals somewhat roughly with the end of their poles when they get a little too excited? This woman needs to get a grip (!) on her metaphors...a little closer to the tip, I'd say. amazingly, the blogger is a guy. if it were a woman, i'd probably find it horrifying. |
|
|
|
Post by Mitchell on Sept 27, 2011 15:55:02 GMT -5
Then why was Greenpeace so torqued off about baby seals getting 80% effaced? |
|
|
|
Post by Don Quixote on Sept 27, 2011 16:03:03 GMT -5
If only baby seals didn't flop so quickly along the ice...
|
|
