|
Post by Mr. Atari on Mar 30, 2016 23:28:42 GMT -5
EDIT: Just a double-check - if any participants want to take another look at the final order, I'm trying to figure out if it's actually a tie or if sol-survivor won by tiebreaker. The percentages are the same, and they're both ranked first. The asterisk indicates that a tiebreaker was used, which to me would indicate sol-survivor won, since her name is listed first in the finishing order. Any thoughts from anyone? I wondered the same thing. I have no idea what the tiebreaker procedure is, but I'm happy to finish in a tie. I have all of the eps, so I'm also glad to step aside from the skyroniter prize pool and let sol-survivor have unfettered access to the booty.
|
|
|
Post by Mod City on Apr 1, 2016 11:38:31 GMT -5
Well, if Mr. A is OK with passing the glory on to sol-survivor, I'm OK with it, as well. I'm just not sure exactly how that ordering system works out. I mean, how do you apply the tie-breaker if nobody's finalists made the finals? Weird.
Thanks for playing again, everyone!
|
|
|
Post by sol-survivor on Apr 2, 2016 11:30:03 GMT -5
Yeah, this was really confusing this year. The layout ESPN used made each bracket really hard to follow for me, and they must have a super-secret formula for tiebreakers. I have no idea how I went from last to a tie for first in one day, but then again there were only four brackets. Anyway, Thank You!!!
|
|
|
Post by crowschmo on Mar 30, 2018 14:32:12 GMT -5
Pet Peeve.
Well, it's 2018 now, but I didn't feel like starting a new thread. Looks like the enthusiasm has faded, heh.
Just wanted to say: I really HATE it when the commentators just yammer on about things that have absolutely nothing to do with the game going on in front of them. There's plays going on and they aren't saying who did what, like who scored, or who made what play or assist or whatever - not commentating on, ya know, what they are supposed to be COMMENTATING on; they just keep TALKING about whatever the hell nonsense they were babbling about before things actually started happening in the game. And I hate when they have some guest on the sidelines or in the crowd and they just start interviewing that person as the game is going, ya know, the game you turned on to WATCH, and they show the person's face the whole time as they are talking, instead of THE GAME, or they shrink the game to this little piece on the side. Just have the audio, that's fine. I don't need to see the person's face as they are talking, just put "Voice of {whoever}."
Or, when they keep showing a replay of something while the game starts up again and you miss an actual LIVE PLAY.
I know they have to say SOME THINGS, but could they shut up for two seconds and just report what's going on in the game? I'd almost rather just hear the game announcer you hear if you were actually at the game instead of all these buffoons yakking it up.
Anyone else?
|
|