|
Post by Mighty Jack on Mar 8, 2008 5:40:34 GMT -5
I just watched the new shorts, I wasn't too impressed with this entry. I remember watching the Cathy one for my Mythic Season article and rejecting it. I had real problems with synching then it got struck and replayed the same scene over and over agaion. On the 3rd try it finally ran smooth. But that was weird. My short review... Why Doesn’t Cathy Eat Breakfast/Petaluma Chicken
|
|
|
Post by Mighty Jack on Mar 8, 2008 13:33:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mst3ktemple on Mar 8, 2008 16:18:51 GMT -5
When were these two shorts originally released?
|
|
|
Post by Captain Hygiene on Mar 8, 2008 21:32:31 GMT -5
Yesterday, as far as I know.
|
|
|
Post by gammer on Mar 8, 2008 22:31:53 GMT -5
I like this one (or these two) better then the previous two. Anyway, I have my review and free preview up. Also, I've decided to seperate my reviews of the shorts into there own section. Now that it appears they are doing more shorts, it makes sense to give them their own section. Anywho..they are here: www.rifftraxfan.com/shortsreviews.html
|
|
|
Post by mst3ktemple on Mar 8, 2008 23:14:12 GMT -5
Um...I was actually asking about the year the original unriffed shorts came out, but thanks Captain.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Hygiene on Mar 8, 2008 23:23:40 GMT -5
Um...I was actually asking about the year the original unriffed shorts came out, but thanks Captain. For some reason I thought the "originally" indicated that you thought it was a compilation of two previously-riffed shorts. In any case I enjoyed them a lot, they were better than the last short at least. I was really hoping it would be two of the "normal" length shorts though
|
|
|
Post by gammer on Mar 10, 2008 10:08:16 GMT -5
Um...I was actually asking about the year the original unriffed shorts came out, but thanks Captain. You can download the originals for free from www.archive.org (they are public domain). Why doesn't Cathy Eat Breakfast is 1972 and Petaluma Chicken is 1932
|
|
|
Post by mst3ktemple on Mar 10, 2008 17:03:20 GMT -5
Thanks Gammer. You are the man. Well, one of them any way.
|
|
|
Post by Zombiejesus on Mar 11, 2008 2:29:31 GMT -5
I don't mean to sound ungrateful, but I find it really hard to enjoy the shorter shorts...it's just not enough time to settle in...
|
|
|
Post by gammer on Mar 11, 2008 8:51:20 GMT -5
I don't mean to sound ungrateful, but I find it really hard to enjoy the shorter shorts...it's just not enough time to settle in... YOU UNGRATEFUL BAS.... just joking I know what you mean. I didn't notice it so much with Petaluma Chicken, but I was hoping there was more to Cathy's Breakfast. Unfortunately, what we saw, was all that was available for the source video
|
|
|
Post by david on Mar 11, 2008 12:58:38 GMT -5
The general absurdity of Petaluma, along with the David Lynch and Foghorn Leghorn riffs had me in stitches. Maybe I'm just easy to please.
|
|
|
Post by mst3ktemple on Mar 11, 2008 16:18:14 GMT -5
I prefer longer shorts too. Wait a minute. What did I just say?
|
|
|
Post by david on Mar 11, 2008 18:51:26 GMT -5
I prefer longer shorts too. Wait a minute. What did I just say? You don't wear daisy dukes, then?
|
|
|
Post by Zombiejesus on Mar 12, 2008 7:35:15 GMT -5
I prefer longer shorts too. Wait a minute. What did I just say? You don't wear daisy dukes, then? The original wording of my previous comment was, "I just can't get into the shorter shorts." Then I realized how that sounded.
|
|