|
|
Post by mummifiedstalin on Jan 31, 2013 22:50:43 GMT -5
No, I'm pretty sure it's just frightening. Nah, just depends on how rigid or pliant the fangs are. |
|
|
|
Post by Mitchell on Feb 1, 2013 7:40:49 GMT -5
I am going to go back to school to study anthropology so I can figure out just how in the hell you've been elected to procreate.
|
|
|
|
Post by siamesesin on Feb 1, 2013 15:36:53 GMT -5
Liar. You're going back for National Geographic boobs.
|
|
|
|
Post by Crowfan on Feb 2, 2013 13:07:25 GMT -5
Liar. You're going back for National Geographic boobs. What's wrong with that? |
|
|
|
Post by GodoHell on Feb 2, 2013 13:34:22 GMT -5
I was in 5th grade (actually in class) when I first discovered the "secret" of National Geographic. At the time, I was living in a small farming community in Northeast Kansas. Being thrifty people, nothing was ever thrown away, meaning the editions of NG went clear back into the 1950's. Rummaging through magazine after magazine during free time in class, in heated search of crotch-cramping pictures, I happened upon a picture from some remote part of Africa. The young woman pictured had adorned herself with a necklace made of burnt-out light bulbs.
Her bare breasts were exactly the same shape.
I am haunted by this image to this day.
THAT IS WHAT IS WRONG WITH THAT.
|
|
|
|
Post by Crowfan on Feb 2, 2013 18:24:19 GMT -5
I can't argue with that. I will say Kansas is scary.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mitchell on Feb 3, 2013 8:50:44 GMT -5
Having my reading comprehension whipped from the wilds of Africa somehow to northeast Kansas has given me whiplash and a migraine. Crowfan, you have permanently scarred me as Godo's light-bulb-boob woman has he. Liar. You're going back for National Geographic boobs. Yours will do just fine, puddin'. |
|
|
|
Post by siamesesin on Feb 3, 2013 21:00:14 GMT -5
Puddin' boobs is right.
Like spotted dick.
|
|
